Total Pageviews

Follow by Email

Wednesday, 22 February 2012


Alarm Clock
I read in the news this morning that some video game developers
 started a $400,000 pledge drive to fund their new video game. In
 just 24 hours, they had collected more than they needed: They
 got 1.4 MILLION!

For a video game. To pay them just to hang out and write code.

QFG/SOTT's fund raising drive is, to say the least, underwhelming.
 Truth isn't wanted anymore: only fun fiction that keeps people from
 having to deal with the real world.

So, let me end your suspense: The answer to the question in the title 
is "yes". The world is ending in 2012. That is, the final implementation
 of the fascist, totalitarian New World Order will be accomplished this
 year and you will be in that "New World" that the global elite have
 designed for you, and planned to implement for a very long time now. 
Oh, indeed, similar New World Order's have been staged in the past
 on smaller scales, but this time it's global because they are all in on
 it together! Former New World Order's didn't really fail, even if they 
ostensibly fell; they just passed the torch around for millennia, spreading
 the disease, growing the sickness in society, until finally, now, with
 global communication and incredible weapons of destruction in their 
hands, they are ready to finalize the Faustian bargain that you, the
 people, signed with your blood.

That's what 2012 is all about. It's not about some grand and glorious
 transformation or ascension to another existence! It's not about 
being 'raptured' to heaven at the right hand of Jesus because you
 helped to 'initiate the Eschaton'! It's not about 'Starseeds' being
 taken aboard spacecraft and getting airlifted to some other planet
 of the '5th dimension'. Pure and simple, prophecy is coming true,
 just not the way you all thought. It is the end of your world as
 human beings, your reduction to pure slave-hood, your children 
turned over to be sex toys or cannon fodder for psychopaths, and
there's nothing you can do about it now.

Well, certainly nothing that is comfortable. And that's the problem. 
You just wanted to be comfortable. You just wanted to have your 
life and live it too! A house, enough food, toys, holidays, a couple
 of kids, growing old with someone, maybe. But no upsets! No hard 
choices! No upsetting the apple-cart just because something is right
 or true or just. You just wanted peace, and in exchange for peace, 
you sold your soul. And, as V said in the movie, V for Vendetta
"where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as
 you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance 
coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this
 happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more 
responsible than others... but again truth be told, if you're looking
 for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror." 

But, not to worry! Such a state of affairs - of such widespread
 suffering and discontent - cannot last! Indeed, not! It can get 
worse as it generally does time and again throughout history.
 You will only have to suffer the totalitarian New World Order
 for about two years then you can look forward to 1) The sudden
 descent of an Ice Age that will kill billions OR 2) cometary swarm
 bombardment that will kill billions OR both.

On the other hand, maybe neither will happen and the masses of people 
will rise up against their oppressors and their oppressors will respond, in
 true psychopathic fashion, but killing billions in a nuclear war.

Take your pick. Frankly, I like the Ice Age option.

Of course, you might argue none of these options will come true; that 
they are mere speculation and can be conveniently dismissed. Even a
 cursory view of the current world situation shows that the world we
 are leaving our children will be virtually unlivable. To wit:
  1. We cannot possibly meet our energy needs in the next 50 years
  2.  with any currently available electric generation system. Today, 
  3. our energy systems barely manage to provide the needed
  4.  energy for the 7 billion people currently on the planet. Many are left,
  5.  literally, in the dark; and those who do have access to energy know
  6.  well how tenuous those energy systems are as even a slight
  7.  increase in demand from inclement weather can bring the
  8.  system to a halt. Yet our population continues to increase, which
  9.  will lead inevitably to greater demands for energy. The U.S. 
  10. Census Bureau estimates that by 2046 the world population
  11.  will have increased to 9 billion.
  12. Widespread agriculture has stripped virtually all existing arable
  13.  land of vital nutrients and has all but completely obliterated
  14.  the top soil. While those in industrial nations have an illusion
  15.  of plenty, supported by a trip to the grocery store to see the
  16.  well-stocked shelves, the majority of the food there consists
  17.  of some form of simple carbohydrates that are grown in large 
  18. quantities with the help of petrochemicals in the form of fuel 
  19. and fertilizer. On average, there are two weeks supply of food
  20.  on supermarket shelves. A change in weather, either from 
  21. alleged "global warming" or the more likely coming ice age, 
  22. and/or a downturn in the availability of fossil fuels will put an
  23.  end to current agricultural practices, leading to mass starvation.
  24. Widespread use of antibiotics has led to new bacteria that produce
  25.  an enzyme that disables antibiotics. These new 'super bugs' have
  26.  already caused relatively small scale pandemics. Each year, new
  27.  'super bugs' are discovered (or created) that prove more difficult
  28.  to combat. Combined with modern transportation, it is only a
  29.  matter of time before one or more of these 'super bugs' causes
  30.  a worldwide pandemic that will completely overwhelm the ability 
  31. of public health systems to respond.
These are merely a few highlights of what await our children in the world
 we are leaving them. None of these are dire predictions based on
 worst-case scenarios. Rather, they are rational, even conservative 
projections into the future based on current trends that show no sign 
of changing. In other words, these are closer to best-case scenarios,
 assuming that nothing unexpected happens in the next 50 years.

Is there any hope? For most of humanity, no. Sorry. The time to have 
activated anything based on hope is long past. You should have done
 it back when Kennedy was murdered. There was a small chance then.
 But your silent acceptance of that gargantuan lie (and all the lies since) 
is what spoke your permission to be enslaved most eloquently.

Certainly, there are some few who will survive but only those who have
 managed to re-activate their Ice Age physiology and mentality.

Human beings were only able to evolve into truly human forms during
 Ice Ages (which covers most of our evolutionary history) because of a
 superior physiology based on a particular diet of protein and fat, which
facilitated big brain development and the ability to accurately assess
 their environment. Additionally, they had very specific social ties. 
Trusting others seems to be an evolutionary strategy that served
 us well for a long time. In that evolutionary struggle, man was
 opposed to a 'natural enemy', the environment and all it contained. 
All he had was his bigger brain to compensate for his smaller strength 
and speed; and, of course, his network.

Since the invention of agriculture, we began to lose our Ice Age edge. 
We were no longer opposed to the natural world out there as the
 sparring partner, we were, instead, opposed to a culture that was 
created and directed by pathological individuals, including psychopaths.
 At the same time, this outer world that was shaped by pathology, 
began to anchor itself within normal humans - they not only lost the 
ability to see pathology in individuals that look like themselves - an 
intra-species predator, they became like their pathological leaders. 
Humanity's failure to perceive this, to adapt, means that our inner
 world, taken into us from the outside by means of identification, has
 become an 'independent power' which, in its turn, by means of
 projection, is our own creation. After all, it is normal humans, not
 pathologicals, who have the real power to 'create reality' as a
 group. Pathologicals only influence us - mostly women - to
 believe certain things are the norm, and we then act as they pull
 our strings. 

This outer reality which has such a powerful influence on the
 formation of our character and the focusing of our creativity, has
 become a power itself and we are being challenged to become 
'new beings' that can evolutionarily adapt to dramatic changes. 
Either we become fully pathological, in which case there will be no 
stress (which is the option that most of humanity seems to have
 chosen), or we return to our roots taking with us the knowledge
 of the new 'opponent' that will enable us to rebuild our social 
bonds and structures and survive through the massive changes 
that are ahead of us.

Because, realistically, even if no cataclysmic scenario of any external kind
 manifests, anybody with two neurons firing can see that we are most
 definitely heading straight into a 'clash of civilizations' though it is not at 
all what is being touted. It is a clash of normal humans with pathologicals 
and right now, they have all the assets (which they have by trickery, 
cunning, cheating). Even the mildest scenario of the future is not
 pleasant to contemplate: Climate Change and its effects on humanity?
 That, alone, will kill billions. Then add the diseases that will strike a 
weakened human race (and are already doing so, though the big
 pandemic is still ahead of us). It's not a pretty picture.

This principle that our inner world is taken into us from the outside by
 means of identification, and then, by way of projection, alters the 
external world so that it corresponds to the inner world even more
 closely, requires some serious thought. Basically, we have to
 bootstrap ourselves out of here by reversing the process: we
 must create an inner world in the face of the opposition of the 
outer world, that then becomes strong enough, EN MASSE, to 
change the outer world. An inner world that recognises pathology in
 power across the world, and all that it has wrought, for what it is,
 which then provides the resolve to do something about it.

But too few people are doing it. I had hopes 17 years ago; I have 
none now. In fact, I'm only writing this because I feel duty bound to 
speak the truth; I have no illusions that enough people are listening 
or even care to make a difference.

As I said, we evolved to trust one another - but that was a world 
where others were trustworthy. We live in a different world now.
The cheaters in our world have evolved ways to induce us to trust
 them, but too few of us are capable of accurately assessing our 
environment, too few of us realize that we are in mortal peril. 

It is, of course, remotely possible that those who are able to accomplish
 this task of rebuilding social connections based on the new evolutionary 
standard of accounting for pathology in the equations, will evolve and
 survive if they can last through the next two years. Those who do not
 evolve will perish. No rapture, Jesus or aliens; no cavalry to the rescue;
 no ascension to the 5th dimension; no waking up of humanity and
 playing nice in the sandbox.

It's pretty much over for the human race as we know it. 2012 is the
 End of the Old world and its possibilities and the beginning of an 
interregnum of open psychopathic rule that I predict will last about
2 years before the horror of the situation sinks in. After that, life will 
only be possible for those who are prepared to survive in the real
 New World and to figure that out, you are on your own now.

That's our Ice Age brain assessment of the environment. That's what I see
 from where I sit. Take it or leave it.