e-tag billing shock
Despite e-tolling on Gauteng s freeways having been delayed
last week, Sanral has continued encouraging motorists to
register for e-tags, which could be illegal. Photo: Mujahid
Safodien
your money – it also wants access to all your bank details
and financial accounts.
The Department of Transport postponed e-tolling on Gauteng’s
freeways on Friday, weeks before the system was due to go
live next month. This is the second time the department has
suspended the multibillion-rand project.
Despite this, Sanral has continued its advertising campaign,
encouraging motorists to register for e-tags. But the
registration of the e-tags may be illegal in terms of the
Consumer Protection Act.
This is according to various organisations who have analysed
the terms and conditions of e-tag accounts.
At the centre of their concerns is clause 33 of Sanral’s terms
and conditions, which states that: “The user hereby
irrevocably authorises the Agency or its duly authorised
agent to obtain from any institution where the user may
have an account, or from any credit bureau, any information
concerning the user. This clause constitutes consent and
an instruction to each such institution to disclose such
information to the Agency or its agent.”
[All the new technology being implemented for registering
devices, such as RICA, have been specifically designed to
capture data. It is all about controlling informaiton on
people. The question is... WHY?]
Dr Cliff Johnston, from the SA National Consumer Union
(Sancu), said this goes against the Financial Services Act,
which states that an institution may not request more
information than is needed.
“So they may see if you have been blacklisted. But what
if you have? Will that mean you won’t be able to register?
Will you not be able to use the road then? How will Sanral
deal with those cases?” Johnston asked.
Sancu intended to complain about the terms and conditions
to the National Consumer Tribunal before the suspension. It
is now planning to approach Sanral’s new board to point out
the illegalities in the conditions.
Another contentious term, said Johnston, was that “Sanral’s
information is correct unless you can prove otherwise. So if
someone fraudulently copies your licence plate, Sanral will
remove money from your account. How are you going to
prove it wasn’t your car? This is illegal in terms of the
Consumer Protection Act.”
[Read this a hundred times if you have to, but make sure that
it sinks in. They are saying that your silence = guilt. If you
are silent, they have the right to continue whatever they
want against you based on the information already in the
agreement (ie. the registration). One of Johan Joubert's
assertions was that if they can do this to us, then we can
do it to them! If we send a bank, corporation or government
departnment an agreement by way of affidavit, or
amendement to the agreement, and they do not respond,
their silence = guilt! What's good for the goose is good for
the gander. Listen to Johan's interviews above, especially
interviews 9 & 10. To break the shackles of corporate greed
and tyranny, we need to use their very laws against them.
Another controversial term was that you must supply Sanral
with your bank account details, giving it access to debit money
from the account “once the user’s e-toll account balance goes
below the user’s predefined top-up threshold level”.
Johnston said Sancu was initially encouraging people to register
for an e-toll account, but only on the prepaid option, without
giving banking details.
“But we soon realised Sanral would not register you without
your bank details.
“What if you are poor and don’t have a bank account? Does
that mean you won’t be allowed to drive on the roads?”
For road users who do not register for an e-tag, Sanral’s terms
are that motorists must pay for the toll within seven days or
they will be punished. But Johnston said this was impossible
as it would take far longer for the notice to be posted to you
and payment made.
The DA has taken its concerns one step further by sending a
complaint of infringements by Sanral to the National
Consumer Tribunal in terms of the Consumer Protection Act
: that users have to give access to their bank accounts for
unknown amounts; there is a high possibility of fraud as
10 percent of all licence plates are cloned or fraudulent;
there is no clarity on how disputed amounts will be
refunded; there are undisclosed administration fees
(R5 for posted statements and 20c for each sms);
identification by e-tag as opposed to number plate is
unclear; and certain road users (minibus taxis and buses)
are exempted, leading to unfair discrimination.
Sanral had not responded to queries at the time of going to print.
What they don’t tell you
* Users have to give access to their bank accounts for unknown
amounts;
* There is a high possibility of fraud as 10 percent of all licence
plates are cloned or fraudulent;
* There is no clarity on how disputed amounts will be refunded;
* There are undisclosed administration fees (R5 for post
statements and 20c for each sms);
* Identification by e-tag as opposed to number plate is unclear;
and
* Certain road users (minibus taxis and buses) are exempted,
leading to unfair discrimination. - The Star
[To refer others to join this community,
please click here]
-- For any further inquires or assistance, Please feel free to contact
me at anytime.
Kind Regards
Patrick
Tel: (+27) 011 - 524-0255
Fax: (+27) 011 - 524-0277
www.norclippet.co.za
www.onlineguarding.com
Kind Regards
Patrick
Tel: (+27) 011 - 524-0255
Fax: (+27) 011 - 524-0277
www.norclippet.co.za
www.onlineguarding.com
