HOW IS THE WORLD GOING TO END IN 2012?

I read in the news this morning that some video game developers

 started a $400,000 pledge drive to fund their new video game. In

 just 24 hours, they had collected more than they needed: They

 got 1.4 MILLION!

For a video game. To pay them just to hang out and write code.

QFG/SOTT's fund raising drive is, to say the least, underwhelming.

 Truth isn't wanted anymore: only fun fiction that keeps people from

 having to deal with the real world.

So, let me end your suspense: The answer to the question in the title 

is "yes". The world is ending in 2012. That is, the final implementation

 of the fascist, totalitarian New World Order will be accomplished this

 year and you will be in that "New World" that the global elite have

 designed for you, and planned to implement for a very long time now. 

Oh, indeed, similar New World Order's have been staged in the past

 on smaller scales, but this time it's global because they are all in on

 it together! Former New World Order's didn't really fail, even if they 

ostensibly fell; they just passed the torch around for millennia, spreading

 the disease, growing the sickness in society, until finally, now, with

 global communication and incredible weapons of destruction in their 

hands, they are ready to finalize the Faustian bargain that you, the

 people, signed with your blood.

That's what 2012 is all about. It's not about some grand and glorious

 transformation or ascension to another existence! It's not about 

being 'raptured' to heaven at the right hand of Jesus because you

 helped to 'initiate the Eschaton'! It's not about 'Starseeds' being

 taken aboard spacecraft and getting airlifted to some other planet

 of the '5th dimension'. Pure and simple, prophecy is coming true,

 just not the way you all thought. It is the end of your world as

 human beings, your reduction to pure slave-hood, your children 

turned over to be sex toys or cannon fodder for psychopaths, and

there's nothing you can do about it now.

Well, certainly nothing that is comfortable. And that's the problem. 

You just wanted to be comfortable. You just wanted to have your 

life and live it too! A house, enough food, toys, holidays, a couple

 of kids, growing old with someone, maybe. But no upsets! No hard 

choices! No upsetting the apple-cart just because something is right

 or true or just. You just wanted peace, and in exchange for peace, 

you sold your soul. And, as V said in the movie, V for Vendetta, 

"where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as

 you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance 

coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this

 happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more 

responsible than others... but again truth be told, if you're looking

 for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror." 

But, not to worry! Such a state of affairs - of such widespread

 suffering and discontent - cannot last! Indeed, not! It can get 

worse as it generally does time and again throughout history.

 You will only have to suffer the totalitarian New World Order

 for about two years then you can look forward to 1) The sudden

 descent of an Ice Age that will kill billions OR 2) cometary swarm

 bombardment that will kill billions OR both.

On the other hand, maybe neither will happen and the masses of people 

will rise up against their oppressors and their oppressors will respond, in

 true psychopathic fashion, but killing billions in a nuclear war.

Take your pick. Frankly, I like the Ice Age option.

Of course, you might argue none of these options will come true; that 

they are mere speculation and can be conveniently dismissed. Even a

 cursory view of the current world situation shows that the world we

 are leaving our children will be virtually unlivable. To wit:

1. We cannot possibly meet our energy needs in the next 50 years
2.  with any currently available electric generation system. Today, 
3. our energy systems barely manage to provide the needed
4.  energy for the 7 billion people currently on the planet. Many are left,
5.  literally, in the dark; and those who do have access to energy know
6.  well how tenuous those energy systems are as even a slight
7.  increase in demand from inclement weather can bring the
8.  system to a halt. Yet our population continues to increase, which
9.  will lead inevitably to greater demands for energy. The U.S. 
10. Census Bureau estimates that by 2046 the world population
11.  will have increased to 9 billion.
12. Widespread agriculture has stripped virtually all existing arable
13.  land of vital nutrients and has all but completely obliterated
14.  the top soil. While those in industrial nations have an illusion
15.  of plenty, supported by a trip to the grocery store to see the
16.  well-stocked shelves, the majority of the food there consists
17.  of some form of simple carbohydrates that are grown in large 
18. quantities with the help of petrochemicals in the form of fuel 
19. and fertilizer. On average, there are two weeks supply of food
20.  on supermarket shelves. A change in weather, either from 
21. alleged "global warming" or the more likely coming ice age, 
22. and/or a downturn in the availability of fossil fuels will put an
23.  end to current agricultural practices, leading to mass starvation.
24. Widespread use of antibiotics has led to new bacteria that produce
25.  an enzyme that disables antibiotics. These new 'super bugs' have
26.  already caused relatively small scale pandemics. Each year, new
27.  'super bugs' are discovered (or created) that prove more difficult
28.  to combat. Combined with modern transportation, it is only a
29.  matter of time before one or more of these 'super bugs' causes
30.  a worldwide pandemic that will completely overwhelm the ability 
31. of public health systems to respond.

These are merely a few highlights of what await our children in the world

 we are leaving them. None of these are dire predictions based on

 worst-case scenarios. Rather, they are rational, even conservative 

projections into the future based on current trends that show no sign 

of changing. In other words, these are closer to best-case scenarios,

 assuming that nothing unexpected happens in the next 50 years.

Is there any hope? For most of humanity, no. Sorry. The time to have 

activated anything based on hope is long past. You should have done

 it back when Kennedy was murdered. There was a small chance then.

 But your silent acceptance of that gargantuan lie (and all the lies since) 

is what spoke your permission to be enslaved most eloquently.

Certainly, there are some few who will survive but only those who have

 managed to re-activate their Ice Age physiology and mentality.

Human beings were only able to evolve into truly human forms during

 Ice Ages (which covers most of our evolutionary history) because of a

 superior physiology based on a particular diet of protein and fat, which

facilitated big brain development and the ability to accurately assess

 their environment. Additionally, they had very specific social ties. 

Trusting others seems to be an evolutionary strategy that served

 us well for a long time. In that evolutionary struggle, man was

 opposed to a 'natural enemy', the environment and all it contained. 

All he had was his bigger brain to compensate for his smaller strength 

and speed; and, of course, his network.

Since the invention of agriculture, we began to lose our Ice Age edge. 

We were no longer opposed to the natural world out there as the

 sparring partner, we were, instead, opposed to a culture that was 

created and directed by pathological individuals, including psychopaths.

 At the same time, this outer world that was shaped by pathology, 

began to anchor itself within normal humans - they not only lost the 

ability to see pathology in individuals that look like themselves - an 

intra-species predator, they became like their pathological leaders. 

Humanity's failure to perceive this, to adapt, means that our inner

 world, taken into us from the outside by means of identification, has

 become an 'independent power' which, in its turn, by means of

 projection, is our own creation. After all, it is normal humans, not

 pathologicals, who have the real power to 'create reality' as a

 group. Pathologicals only influence us - mostly women - to

 believe certain things are the norm, and we then act as they pull

 our strings. 

This outer reality which has such a powerful influence on the

 formation of our character and the focusing of our creativity, has

 become a power itself and we are being challenged to become 

'new beings' that can evolutionarily adapt to dramatic changes. 

Either we become fully pathological, in which case there will be no 

stress (which is the option that most of humanity seems to have

 chosen), or we return to our roots taking with us the knowledge

 of the new 'opponent' that will enable us to rebuild our social 

bonds and structures and survive through the massive changes 

that are ahead of us.

Because, realistically, even if no cataclysmic scenario of any external kind

 manifests, anybody with two neurons firing can see that we are most

 definitely heading straight into a 'clash of civilizations' though it is not at 

all what is being touted. It is a clash of normal humans with pathologicals 

and right now, they have all the assets (which they have by trickery, 

cunning, cheating). Even the mildest scenario of the future is not

 pleasant to contemplate: Climate Change and its effects on humanity?

 That, alone, will kill billions. Then add the diseases that will strike a 

weakened human race (and are already doing so, though the big

 pandemic is still ahead of us). It's not a pretty picture.

This principle that our inner world is taken into us from the outside by

 means of identification, and then, by way of projection, alters the 

external world so that it corresponds to the inner world even more

 closely, requires some serious thought. Basically, we have to

 bootstrap ourselves out of here by reversing the process: we

 must create an inner world in the face of the opposition of the 

outer world, that then becomes strong enough, EN MASSE, to 

change the outer world. An inner world that recognises pathology in

 power across the world, and all that it has wrought, for what it is,

 which then provides the resolve to do something about it.

But too few people are doing it. I had hopes 17 years ago; I have 

none now. In fact, I'm only writing this because I feel duty bound to 

speak the truth; I have no illusions that enough people are listening 

or even care to make a difference.

As I said, we evolved to trust one another - but that was a world 

where others were trustworthy. We live in a different world now.

The cheaters in our world have evolved ways to induce us to trust

 them, but too few of us are capable of accurately assessing our 

environment, too few of us realize that we are in mortal peril. 

It is, of course, remotely possible that those who are able to accomplish

 this task of rebuilding social connections based on the new evolutionary 

standard of accounting for pathology in the equations, will evolve and

 survive if they can last through the next two years. Those who do not

 evolve will perish. No rapture, Jesus or aliens; no cavalry to the rescue;

 no ascension to the 5th dimension; no waking up of humanity and

 playing nice in the sandbox.

It's pretty much over for the human race as we know it. 2012 is the

 End of the Old world and its possibilities and the beginning of an 

interregnum of open psychopathic rule that I predict will last about

2 years before the horror of the situation sinks in. After that, life will 

only be possible for those who are prepared to survive in the real

 New World and to figure that out, you are on your own now.

That's our Ice Age brain assessment of the environment. That's what I see

 from where I sit. Take it or leave it.